One of the largest publishers in the United States, the Johns Hopkins University Press combines traditional books and journals publishing units with cutting-edge service divisions that sustain diversity and independence among nonprofit, scholarly publishers, societies, and associations. Although this methodology will not end all the controversies on giving each human right indicator its relative place, nor rank individual countries on a world scale, this method is a step closer to a more objective measurement of human rights performance. Alternatively, our methodology defines the extreme ends of the spectrum of human rights records by some widely acceptable standard, and then assesses the weights for the whole spectrum through Discriminant Analysis. First, indicators can be weighted to reflect the values of the one constructing the index-an arbitrary scale. Relative weights can be attributed to these indicators in one of two ways. These studies fall short, however, because they do not attribute weight to these indicators, and thus produce neither a composite indicator nor a group classification of countries according to their overall levels of performance. A number of studies have already collected data on various indicators of human rights abuse. This article sets out to provide a new methodology for attributing weights to the various indicators of human rights abuse.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |